What I find a bit shameful – and I have not seen the business press pick up on this theme yet - is that Mark Hurd, who deserves great, continued praise for engineering the HP turnaround (despite the fact that you get the feeling he hates the spotlight or at least gives you that feeling) really does not need the additional responsibilities that come with heading up the board of an $90 billion company. The Wall Street Journal’s Michael Connolly does note in his story yesterday that combining Hurd’s CEO and chairman’s title is “regressive” from a corporate governance perspective. Connolly speculates that this might be an interim move until things settle down next year. You have to wonder why Dunn is being allowed to hang around as Chairwoman until January.
9.14.2006
HP's Woes Mount
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment